Unified government or Tyranny?

By Mildred P. Dingleberry

 

The 2024 U.S. election was one of the most closely watched in recent history, especially amidst global crises in a politically polarized world. Setting political ideologies aside, many are now questioning what is truly at stake. Is the U.S. at risk of tipping towards tyranny? Some argue that Trump is dangerously close to this—not only because of his policies, but due to the dominance of the Republican Party over most branches of government.

 

With Republicans controlling the presidency, Senate, House (or nearly so), governors, and even the courts—along with the possibility of solidifying a 6-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court—concerns grow that Trump could replace some of the Court’s senior justices, extending conservative influence for the decades to come.

 

We may be entering what some call a ‘Republican era.’

 

What would this mean for the country? The U.S. was founded on the principles of democracy and the separation of powers. Yet, it may soon face one-party control across all three branches—a scenario that could disrupt the balance of power. Americans should be wary of a Trump administration that may prioritize unchecked power and punishment of perceived enemies—both of which Trump has repeatedly vowed to do.

 

John Kelly, Trump’s second chief of staff, described him as someone who “has no idea what America stands for.” Under Trump, the "land of the free" may not be so free for many. Trump has long been outspoken about controversial agendas, often promoting divisive rhetoric and stoking racial tensions. This year, he reportedly reduced the choice of leadership to a question of race, asking, 'Would you rather have the black president or the white president?’ Additionally, he faces multiple sexual assault allegations and has been charged with 34 felony counts. Evidently, his record is far from pristine.

 

So why did 73 million people vote for him? Many argue Trump’s economic policies were beneficial, but here are the facts: His Tax Cuts and Jobs Act added trillions to the deficit, benefiting the wealthy and large corporations with little reinvestment. His trade war reduced GDP by 0.20%, capital stock by 0.10%, and led to a loss of 142,000 full-time jobs. In the end, it resulted in the largest tax increase in decades. In 2024, Trump promises tax cuts of 1.2% for those earning over $360,000, while raising taxes on everyone else. Above all else his upcoming policies on tariffs with a blanket 20% tariffs on goods manufactured abroad and 60% in China. Tariffs ultimately cause inflation meaning Americans will be paying more for everyday use this can also cause trade wars decreasing America’s domestic export harming US businesses. This is exacerbated by the fact that the US already faces problems in regard to recent inflation rates. Trump policies will ultimately make this worse, further driving up the cost of living for US citizens. 

 

When Trump claims he will be good for the American people, his definition of "the people" clearly refers to those like him—wealthy, privileged men.

 

In the past, presidents like FDR, Lincoln, and Nixon wielded significant influence over the other branches of government. However, none had the level of control Trump may gain in a second term. FDR faced court opposition, Lincoln’s opponents seceded, and Nixon was undone by Watergate. We may be witnessing an unprecedented moment in U.S. history.

 

While some argue a unified government could lead to more efficient policymaking, others fear it could deepen divisions, with fewer voices able to challenge decisions. Even with Republican majorities in all three branches, it doesn't guarantee tyranny. In the lead-up to the election, many Republican politicians voiced support for Vice President Kamala Harris, suggesting that differing opinions and coalitions will persist even within one party. Given the unique nature of the current moment, how these dynamics will unfold remains uncertain. It’s unclear whether this will strengthen Trump’s position or foster the rise of opposition to defend the rights of those being targeted.